I come to DA when I need to hit the 'creative idle and coffee-break' button - to have a quick catch up with a few good buddies, empty my inbox and browse more-less aimlessly through random news, journals, forums and galleries. And since for past few days I've been working on a personal project that happens to be so emotionally draining that I have to get up and leave it alone after ten minutes and do something else for several hours just to be able to face the next ten minute slot, my aimless drifting through various art communities increased proportionally.
When you just observe and watch quietly from the sides, pretty soon you start spotting patterns. It can be anything - ideas, concepts, arguments, styles, debates, divisions, you name it , the overwhelming 'us' and 'them' thread that seems to run right across the board, regardless what one looks at - 'professionals' vs 'hobbyists', 'traditional 'vs 'digital', 'high-end' vs 'low-end', 'modelers' vs 'renderers', 'my little ponies' vs 'zombie-fetishists', 'big-boobied Amazon women' vs Grimmy/Ichi-or-'insert-your-favourite-slash-combo porn - whatever. It seems that once someone stakes up their patch in any of the groups turning it into 'us', the basic rules of civilized conduct, tolerance and common sense run for the hills, the misconceptions turn to prejudices, and snowball out of control before one can finish typing their user name.
There is 'good stuff' and 'bad stuff' - and it almost NEVER corresponds to our own niche tastes, regardless how loud we can shout about it.
I have no tent to pitch in any particular corner of the muddy camping site and out a few very few personal mottoes I stick to, this one comes at the very top:
"Do not judge your neighbor until you walk two moons in his moccasins.". So - here' s my random 'moccasin collection', in no particular order.
1. 'Photo-manipulation is inferior/easier to do than the 'proper photography''
Really? Are you absolutely sure? Have you tried to do it yourself? Do you know what it takes (and how long) to create a good photo-manipulation, slaving over brushes, layers, masks , compositing and hand-painting the lot if necessary, creating a different mood, re-lighting the lot? No? So - where do you get this idea ?
2. 'Beginners should be separated from us advanced lot, they are bringing the whole site down'
So, let me get this clear... you were born with a brush in one hand, and a canvass with 'Night Watch' Mark Two that would make Rembrandt bawl his eyes out in the other? Even Beethoven had to start form somewhere - and it wasn't the Ninth. Young, aspiring artists should be given all the support, guidance and encouragement - because we have all been in their shoes (unless, of course, you were the one-off who could wipe the floor with Van Gogh and Caravaggio before you stopped soling you nappies).
The point is - vast majority of the oft-derided and mocked amateurs and beginners would love to get better - but they don't know the first how to go about it . So here's my suggestion - be generous and supportive in your talent and skill, show the places where they can learn the basics, offer sound and constructive advice, pick a noob and mentor them, help them grow, learn and develop so they are no longer groping in the dark, and what do you know - pretty soon you'll have less and less cookie-cutter amazonian women/manga-bishies with shaky grasp of anatomy/winged everything/traced stuff and more and more quality stuff you'd be less inclined to turn your professional nose at. Everybody wins, right?

Or is being an evangelical purist stuck up one's own arse so much more pleasant and satisfying an option?
3. ' All nudity is artistic'
No, it isn't. I have absolutely no beef with porn - I'm glad it was there while I was teenager. However - once I grew out of the eight grade and got to play with the real people, the novelty wore off. Porn is a pure utility, a functional work that serves a very defined and clear purpose. Unlike erotic art, it aspires to no message, it probes no emotional depths , asks no profound questions of the human condition - it is what it is, and it does what it's aimed to do effectively and without the need to dress it up in something that it is not. One of the defining features of porn, actually, is its honesty - please, don't take it away by tarting it up as a 'work of art' (or in that case everyone with a set of genitals could rightfully claim to be an 'artist'. Sorry to break it to you, folks, but having a pair of balls or a p**sy doesn't automatically turn us into junior Robert Mapplethorpes .)
4. 'There's no such thing as erotic art, it's all porn'
Wrong again. Some of the most sublime, inspiring and sensual works of art were unashamedly erotic, celebrating human body both clothed and naked - and without a box of Kleenex in sight.
5. 'Fan-art is inferior to 'proper art''
It takes as long and as much skill and care to paint Uchiha Sasuke as it does to paint something that just popped out in your head. Don't believe me? C'mon - give it a go. Anyone who has ever wrestled with Sesshomaru's or Sephiroth's hair will tell you that the amount of hours spent cursing runs into days and sometimes weeks. Not to mention that a fanartist faces a very critical and often capricious and picky fan-community who are spoiled for choice and have a very clear ideas about how they like their favourite characters to be seen.
6. 'Too many pictures of big-boobied women'
You mean - not skillfully done pics of well-endowed ladies - otherwise I'd pass on the complaint with great relish to Messers Royo and Vallejo, and see what their thoughts would be on the issue of scantily-clad Amazonian goddesses.Then I'd politely ask them to return their royalty cheques - retroactive.

7 'Digital painting is inferior to traditional painting'
Have you tried it? Does the digital painting process perhaps involve a completely different theory of colour? Composition? Maybe a good eye somehow magically appears only when a Wacom tablet is placed at least a hundred metres from the room in which creative process takes place?
8. '3D is easy, it is inferior to painting/photography'
Have you tried your hand in 3D? Would you like to try? It takes hours and hours and hours and hours of hard slogging to do a decent 3D work - as long and with as much skill as it takes to paint a decent picture. Sometimes even longer. There's no 'erase' button ('undo' option is very limited), and as a 3D artist you are constrained by more factors than just your imagination or the level of skill. Just to light the 3D scene can be a teeth-pulling experience (I've recently watched in awe someone trying to create a semblance of soft body dynamics and setting up the indirect lighting with accurate caustics and the rest of the works in DAZ - if that ain't a bitch, then I don't know what is.)
9. 'Amateurs should not be allowed to display their work alongside the industry professionals, they should be segregated and kept in their own play-pen '
You are a professional, right? You are head-and-shoulders above the tinkering Great Unwashed of the Amateur Realm, the quality differences should be clear for all to see - your professional and artistic pride surely can't suffer by being side by side with someone's eager but awkward doodles? Are the hobbyists/enthusiasts/self-taught doodlers taking your jobs away from you? Do you sit at the dole office waiting for your forty-odd quid a week because some Wacom/pencil/Poser-happy-Mum-of-three stole that perfect Hollywood blockbuster job right under your nose? 'Coz if she did - my hat goes off to her - good on you, Mrs Smith, you go, girl!
Also see '2' above.
10. 'People who use pre-made content in their 3D are inferior to those who model every triangle form scratch'
Not even the most inept low/mid-end 3D software user just drags and drops and renders after they played with their new toy for more than a few months - even the greenest amongst the noobs soon gets bored of the drag and drop approach - every single one of them and they gradually start modifying/changing things until they eventually change the stuff so much it completely overhauls the original design. And - believe it or not - that takes time and skill, too. Not to mention that the financial cost of even the humblest of shopping sprees with Vue/Max/Maya/DAZ/Poser/C4D/Carrara content providers must be eye-watering.
It takes much more than just drag-and-drop to visualize the scene, compose, pose, light, render and turn out a decent result. You can have the most hyper-realistically modeled-from-scratch interior, complete with the fruit fly in the banana bowl, but it will still - even with its flawless VRay natural daylight - look no more appealing or engaging than a page from an Ikea catalogue. It is very, very rare that one person excels both in technical modelling aspect as they do in the actual emotional content. It takes a lot of talent, time and skill to model - but it takes a lot of talent, time and skill to create a scene that you'd want to hang on your wall.
11. 'Poser/DS users produce crap/their software is inferior/their skills are beyond par/they shouldn't be called artists'
Creating a piece of art in a particular software doesn't automatically determine its quality. There are some stunning works produced by people working with low/mid-end applications that are either free or cost a fraction of any flagship software by Maxon or Autodesk. As it happens, very few enthusiasts can afford a three-grand program, with the few-grand-worth of hardware that goes with it. They also have less time to work on their 3D prowess than someone who's job is to get paid to create something with all those expensive toys - when you take all of that into account, it is only natural you have nowhere near as many power-users amongst the enthusiast as you get amongst the professionals. Ergo - the quality is not the same. However, when you compare like-for-like, the best of the enthusiasts on low/mid-end applications holds its own easily with the best of the rest.
12. 'Not enough male erotica/male erotica is being discriminated against'
Really? What exactly constitutes 'male erotica'? Male body? Naked male body? A penis close-up? A close up of an erection? Do we have to set up a special counter - one dick per each damsel without knickers with the camera close enough to count the individual hairs on her freshly done 'brazilian'? A pair of nuts for every muff? One boner for every bush? Would that make everybody happier? See under '3' above.
12. 'Too much male erotica'
Oh, come on... See above.
I could come up with more, but *looking at the time* I'm due to get back to my next ten-minute work slot.

Be happy, kids, play nicely, chill out and celebrate the differences
listening to:
[link]